Is a Pension worth the effort anymore?

You might have noticed a bit of a drop-off in share values lately?

If you’ve got a pension, it’s probably worth less than it was a year ago.  So why bother paying any more in? Or, if you’re young enough, why bother starting one?

Forget, for a minute, that “pensions” usually seem to be over-priced contracts, of more benefit to the pension provider than to you.

For example, consider the sentence “do I need a pension to live on?”

Erm, I don’t know. Do you?

Will you really retire at 50?

Will you need any more than the six grand or so the state will (hopefully still) provide?

Remember thata couple of generations ago, people retired at 65 and weren’t expected to make it to 70, so they didn’t really need to worry.

Now, try replacing the words “a pension” with “some money“?

If you’ve done that, and the consequences of NOT having “some money” to live on are worse than doing without a bit of your spendable stuff today, then you’ve got over the hard bit – you need to do some saving.

You could assume that your parents will give you some money, but that might not be such a dead cert. for a few reasons.  Quite a few oldies are spending your inheritance for you.  Quite a few are finding that their wealth won’t last longer than they do.

So, back to this saving.  Old-fashioned, put away part of every month’s income, proper saving.

Should you do your saving through “a pension” or “a bank account” or “investments” or “your own home” or “a property” or “a business” or  “having lots of children“?

A pension might suit you if you if you like the idea of your saving getting an instant boost from the taxman (taxperson?).  I’m generalising so much that an actuary would faint here, but – the tax boost is the usually same as the level of tax you pay on your income.  Eg, if you pay 20% tax, then your £100 gets increased to £125 immediately.

It won’t suit you if you want freedom to spend the money any way you like, whenever you want.

A bank account might suit better if you prefer simplicity (any old bank account would do the trick) or if you might need the money before you retire.

It might not suit you so much if you regard that bank account as accessible savings.  This is a problem I encounter a lot:
‘I don’t like pensions.’
‘Fine, so what are you doing instead?’
‘Well, I had some savings but I spent them on [insert your vice here]’.

I’m not saying I don’t trust you not to spend it…just…I’ve been lied to before y’know?

Investments? same issues as bank accounts really.  The choice between cash and investments?  I must save that for another day.

Your own home will keep you during retirement provided you can work out a way to extract money from it.  Eg, flog the house and move in with the kids, borrow against the house and let the kids pay it back from the house proceeds (provided that somebody will lend against the house at the appropriate time).

Property, other than your own home?  What can I say?  Not a popular choice at the moment.  But.  I don’t know anybody who’s lost money on property over the long term.
Long Term!
If you’ve got a 10 year plus game plan, and a nice lump sum deposit, and you choose the property carefully, it’ll probably work.

I’m assuming you haven’t the cash to buy outright, because then you’re investing not saving.  Again, that’s a whole different subject.

It might suit you if you’ve got a lump sum to throw at it, and you’re happy to be involved.  It’s your asset, nobody will look after it like you.

It won’t suit you if the thought of having the extra mortgage is terrifying and it simply won’t work if you can’t put your hands on the deposit.  Remember that the mortgage needs to be paid even if you have no tenant, and the cost of buying a property can be quite high.

A business can work VERY well.  It can keep you, and maybe the next generation, off the streets.  All you need to do is become/remain very successful.

Having lots of children will also work, but it takes years of effort.  You need to instill a sense of guilt so that they know they are expected to keep you during retirement.  Then you should probably make sure they end up rich, or the plan could backfire horribly.

There isn’t a best and worst solution, just the one that suits you best.

Some Warnings:

  • If you’ve no UK earnings, all the pension stuff won’t apply to you
  • Only a crazy person would do something they don’t understand.  Get more information til you DO understand, or take some advice.  Preferably from an adviser who doesn’t shift awkwardly in their chair when you ask about paying a fee.
  • Anything that involves taking on a debt needs careful thought..
Flora Maudsley-Barton

Here's a little more information about our team:

Q: Qualifications Include

A: My degree in modern languages included a module on economics and personal finance, and that's how I got into financial planning.

Since then, I've become dual qualified as both a Certified Financial Planner and a Chartered Financial Planner, including the specialist qualifications in Tax & Trusts (G10) and Pensions (AF3/G60).

The full list is:

AF3 - Pensions (CII) (I did that to totally update my pension knowledge, as I had done G60 in 1994.)
K10 - Retirement Options (CII)
K20 - Pensions Investment Options (CII)
G20 - Personal Investment Planning (CII)
Chartered Financial Planner (CII)
ER1 - Equity Release (CII)
HR1 - Home Reversion Plans (CII)
G10 - Taxation and Trusts (CII)
CFP - Certified Financial Planner Licence (IFP)
H15 - Supervision and Sales (CII) 

In November 2016 I added the STEP (Society of Trust and Estate Practicioners) Certificate for Financial Services.

Q: Do your clients have anything in common with each other?

A: They are all lovely and there are a few similarities in their aims that I've noticed. 

Many of my clients want to do more than just meet their own needs. They also see themselves as custodians of their money for the next generation or for other beneficiaries. 

In other cases, their aim is to manage their wealth efficiently during their lifetime, with the aim of spending it all… but minimising tax on the way there.

Q: What type of work do you enjoy most?

A: I do get a real sense of satisfaction from the work with those clients who engage me to manage the needs of two generations of the same time. That can be 'just' a long-term and balanced investment strategy or it can be trust planning and estate planning to avoid paying too much Inheritance Tax.

Q: Where would you be right now if you weren't at work?

A: In the Lakes

Q: In the film of your life, who would play you?

A: In my head, it's Uma Thurman, but I expect they would approach 'Nursey' from Blackadder II.

Q: Curry or Hot Pot?

A: Agh, too difficult. Curry.

Q: Sherbert or Chocolate?

A: Chocolate

Q: Lawn or Flowers?

A: Lawn

Q: What are you most likely to do whilst being 'on hold'?

A: Infuriate my colleagues by opening conversations then cutting off their reply when my call is answered.